|
The last example is perhaps the most interesting, as it shows how
differently the same visual idea can be implemented depending on the
types of curves you use for it. The logos shown on Fig. 9 are the
two last drafts created for the FansEdge site, and the team of site creators was
being reportedly "very torn between the two logos," although their final
decision was in favor of the top draft which is "more distinctive."
(Please check out this logo's
full genealogy showing all of the earlier
variants that led to this final couple of images.)
Those who have carefully followed my discourse can see at once that
the two logos shown on Fig. 9 occupy the quadrants 1 (the top draft)
and 3 (the bottom draft) on the chart. In my view, the bottom
variant with its acute curvature variations, asymmetric and dynamic
shape would perhaps be a better match for the site's supposed audience
of sports fans. On the other hand, the bottom version is somewhat
lacking in architectonics, and since the text line doesn't attempt to
provide a strong enough horizontal base, the whole thing may seem a bit
unstable.
On the contrary, the top logo is well balanced at the expense of
losing much of the shape's dynamism. Although the lines used have low
curvature range, their smooth flow and only a minimum loyalty to
architectonics make the logo look pretty relaxed rather than artificial
and "Modern Antiquean." The flirty curved tip at the top even gives the
image a somewhat playful appearance, providing a visual counterpoint for
the fancy Humanist Antiqua font used in the text.
One final example of curvilinearity to which I would like to draw
your attention has nothing to do with visual design, although it is very
important in aircraft design and engineering. If you cut an airplane's
wing parallel with the flight direction, the section will have a
complex, smoothly streamlined shape called an airfoil. Modern
airfoils come as a result of extensive research and experiments in
aerodynamics labs, but their practical objective of generating maximum
lift with minimum drag (air resistance) defines their aesthetic value
which is obvious to everyone with an eye for the beauty of shapes. I'd
recommend that those interested in non-linear design spend some time
browsing the UIUC airfoils database, where each airfoil is
shown as a GIF image. For an example, here's the CLARK Y airfoil (the wing's front edge is on
the left), which is one of the most widely used - and isn't it
beautiful! |
|